Full VerdictFree scan

Is ChatGPT repeating your worst review?

Buyers ask AI before they buy. We show you what ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Google's AI Overview tell them, the pages they quote, what it costs you, and the reply we'd draft. Free, about 30 seconds.

See a sample verdict

ChecksChatGPTPerplexityGeminiGooglewith web search on. Nothing posts without your call.

ChatGPT, asked “Is Halden Outdoor worth it?”

Exposed

Mostly, yes. Halden jackets are warm and well cut for the price. Several Reddit users say the zips fail within a season, and the brand has never replied. Owners rate the fit and insulation highly.

Sources it usedreddit.comhalden.comoutdoorgearlab.com
Illustrative. Halden Outdoor is a made-up brand.

A stranger wrote it. ChatGPT reads it out.

Assistants don't form their own view of you. They search, and repeat what ranks. For most consumer brands that's a thread nobody on the team has read this month.

  1. A buyer asks an assistant whether you're worth the money.

  2. It searches the web, the way the buyer would have.

  3. It finds the Reddit thread sitting second for your name.

  4. It repeats the complaint. Your silence goes into the answer too.

Approve the reply. Change the answer.

When something deserves an answer, you get one decision card: the thread, the stakes, and a reply drafted in your voice. Try it.

Decision 41Reply now

r/BuyItForLife: “Is Halden still worth it?”

Second on Google for your name and “review”. Quoted by ChatGPT and Perplexity. No reply from you.

Your draft
“Fair question. Here's what changed this year, and where we still get it wrong. If your jacket is from the batch people are describing, message me and I'll replace it.”

Example card. Halden Outdoor is an illustrative brand.

What buyers read on the thread now

“The zips fail within a season, and the brand has never replied.”

What ChatGPT says today

“Mostly, yes. But several Reddit users say the zips fail within a season, and the brand has never replied.”

Watched
Spotted Tuesday, when the thread climbed from fifth to second.
Judged
Negative, quoted by two assistants, unanswered. Most mentions never become a card.
Drafted
In your voice, from facts you've signed off. Nothing unconfirmed gets invented.
Your call
Approve, edit or decline from your phone. You post it yourself.

Put a number on it.

Every scan ends with one figure: the demand that meets a bad thread or answer before it reaches your site. It's a range, every assumption is shown, and you can change the ones that are yours.

20,000
€100
6%

Monthly demand that meets the thread before your site

€2.1k-€8.4k

About 35% of those searchers meet the thread, on Google or inside an AI answer; 5 to 20% of them walk away.

Illustrative. Your scan uses your real search volume and the real position of your worst thread.

Monday, a few cards. Thirty days later, proof.

Monitoring clients get three to five cards a week, ranked by what's at stake. Twenty minutes, from your phone. Then we go back and check whether each reply changed anything.

  • Decision 43Ignore

    A passing mention, two upvotes

  • Decision 42Watch

    “Delivery took three weeks”

  • Decision 41Reply now

    “Is Halden still worth it?”

What ChatGPT said about Halden after Decision 41

  1. Day 0Repeats the zip complaint. The thread ranks second.
  2. Day 7Adds that the brand has since responded.
  3. Day 14Mentions the replacement offer. The thread drops to third.
  4. Day 30Leads with warmth and fit. The complaint is a footnote.

Illustrative. Your monthly report shows this for every card you approve.

Proof you can check.

We're new, so there are no client logos here yet. What we can show you is exactly how it works, down to the line of code.

  • Quoted word for word.

    Every claim we flag is copied exactly from the assistant's answer, with the page it came from. If our judge paraphrases, the claim is dropped.

    lib/judge.ts

  • Never a false all-clear.

    If the scan couldn't reach a source, it tells you what it missed. An incomplete scan can't come back as quiet.

    lib/scan.ts · tested

  • Ranked and quoted.

    A thread does the most damage when it ranks for your name and an assistant repeats it. We check both, and weight them together.

    lib/scan.ts

  • Nothing that can post.

    There is no posting code in VerdictDeck. Not hidden behind a setting: it doesn't exist. Every reply goes out from your account, by you.

    the whole codebase

Read how we judgeSee a sample Full Verdict

We will never post for you.

Plenty of tools publish AI replies on your behalf. That's how brands end up apologising on the internet. A person on your side decides every reply and posts it from your own disclosed account.

No fake accounts, no fake reviews, no seeded threads, no buried complaints, and no posting permissions. If someone asks us for any of that, we turn the work down.

Honest about who this is for.

A good fit

  • Founder-led consumer brands doing roughly €1m to €30m, selling online, in categories where buyers check Reddit first.
  • Founders who still read their own reviews, and already know the thread that bothers them.
  • Twenty minutes a week. We do the watching; you make the few calls that matter.

Not a fit

  • Set-and-forget automation. Other tools will argue on Reddit for you, and disappoint you more cheaply.
  • Content removal or astroturfing. It fails, and it's exactly what your customers already suspect.
  • Pre-launch products, or brands whose PR team already owns this.

Want a person to check it?

The scan is automated. The Full Verdict isn't. A reviewer checks every AI answer against its sources, cuts anything we can't stand behind, and sends you one page. If it's all quiet, we say so in writing.

  • The threads and reviews that rank for your name
  • Which ones AI assistants are already quoting
  • A verdict on each: reply now, watch, or ignore
  • One draft reply in your voice, so you can judge us

Free. We'll email you to confirm when it will arrive. See a sample Full Verdict.

Free, no card, no mailing list. Used to deliver your result, deleted on request.

What it costs.

Find out where you stand for free. Pay only if there's something worth watching.

  • Instant Scan

    Free

    automated, about 30 seconds

    What three assistants say about you, the threads they cite, and your exposure range.

    Scan my brand

  • Full Verdict

    Free

    human-reviewed, one page

    Every source checked by a person, a verdict on each thread, and one draft reply in your voice.

    Request my Full Verdict

  • Monitoring

    Per brand

    priced by brand size, quoted in your Full Verdict

    Daily watching, a Monday deck of decision cards, outcome checks at 7, 14 and 30 days, and a monthly report. 30 days' notice to stop.

    Start with a scan

Running brands for clients? Send Full Verdicts and monitoring under your own name, and keep every brand you register. Terms per brand, by conversation.

See the partner programme

Questions you'd ask anyway.

Anything else goes to hello@verdictdeck.com, and a person answers.

Do you ever post replies for us?

No. A card only becomes a reply when someone on your side approves it and posts it from your own account. We don't hold posting permissions, and we won't ask for them.

Which assistants do you check?

ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, with web search on, asked the questions buyers ask. Every scan shows the exact prompts and when they ran. Answers change from run to run, so one scan is a snapshot.

What does it cost?

The Instant Scan and the Full Verdict are free. Monitoring is priced per brand, set by your monthly branded searches, which your scan measures. Your price is written into your Full Verdict before you agree to anything, and there's 30 days' notice to stop.

Isn't this astroturfing?

No. We help you say true things, in your own name, where you're allowed to speak. Drafts only use facts you've approved, and they go out from your disclosed brand account.

What if the scan finds nothing?

Then you get a clean result, in writing. If the scan couldn't check something, it says so instead of calling you clean.

Can I see what a Full Verdict looks like?

Yes. There's a full sample for an illustrative brand at verdictdeck.com/sample, laid out exactly as yours would be.

How do you decide what counts against me?

The exact questions, Google searches, verdict rules and cost assumptions are published at verdictdeck.com/method, generated from the scanner's own settings.

What happens to the details I send?

They're used to run your scan and reply to you. Never sold, never added to a list. The services we rely on are named on the privacy page.